Aqua KE Gov Doc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK E-MAIL ALERTS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novotny, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gardenier, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Novotny, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gardenier, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Western
Right arrow Salmon (saltwater)
Right arrow Salmon (anadromous)
Right arrow Department of Energy
Aqua KE Government Documents 2004:9150240


Publication

Pen Rearing and Imprinting of Fall Chinook Salmon

Annual Report 1985

Jerry F. Novotny, Thomas L. Macy and James T. Gardenier

Document format: pdf

Publisher: U.S. Department of Energy

Creation date: May 1, 1985

Upriver bright fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) are being reared in a backwater and a pond along John Day Reservoir to evaluate the benefits of rearing fish and releasing them off-station compared to traditional hatchery procedures. Fish reared in net pens at a density/feeding combination judged to be the economic optimum of those used during 1984 rearing trials exhibited good growth and smolt development. Size of fish averaged 112 fish/lb (4.0g/fish), ATPase activities ranged from 16.4 to 29.5 micromoles Pi/mg prot/hr at release and total mortality of fish was low among pens, ranging from 0.3 to 1.1%. Poor growth and smolt development was observed in fish reared in a large barrier net, especially during the initial two weeks after stocking. In addition, mortality of fish in the barrier net was high (49%) in relation to any of the other treatments tested thus far. The combined effects of generally poor condition of fish at stocking, low zooplankton densities during the initial two weeks of rearing, and losses to predation were thought to be the primary causes of the slow growth rates and high mortality. Unfed fish in pens utilized the available natural food base, but zooplankton densities were apparently not sufficient for growth, and may have been marginal for sustenance, especially at higher density. ATPase activities at release were significantly higher in low-density pens than in higher density pens, but development at all densities was retarded when compared with ATPase activities of fed fish. Preliminary cost estimates for producing fish-using the rearing strategies developed in the current pen-rearing study compared favorably with the average costs of rearing salmonids in a Northwest hatchery.

Key Words: DOE • Salmon • Chinook Salmon • Threatened and Endangered Species • Natural Stock Augmentation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK E-MAIL ALERTS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by Island Press.